00:00
00:00
mutty99

126 Audio Reviews w/ Response

All 608 Reviews

-Official NGUAC 2020 Tryouts Review-

This was one of the most complex submissions i scored for this round.
The concept wasn't easy at all to execute in a long musical piece such as this, and i think you've chosen the right instruments + the right usage and position for them, making a solid basic overall structure; the eqs are carefully processed too.
The only big issue i have with this track is the solo voice part of the vocal section: even if the text is well written and the pitches are all spot on, they are processed in a way that i'm not fully fond of, and there were some little off-tune notes too, especially in the beginning. The sections 2:57-4:17 and 5:45-7:05 back up and give a huge rise to the score: they are the best sections in the entire track, and the most effective in terms of "concept communication".
Overall, you did a pretty good job, standing out well from the other contestants, i give you props for that! I want to see you going all out in the next rounds, so give it your best shot =)

Originality: 2/2
Composition: 2/2
Structure: 2/2
Tecnicity: 1/2
Impact: 1.5/2

Total: 8.5/10

Troisnyx responds:

Ah, thank you so much for the review! 💖

I find that this track has something that polarises listeners: if it's not the wavering child's voice, it's the distortion. If it's not that, it's how depressing this track is. All in all, though, I'm grateful to hear that your experience of this has been largely positive. 😁

-Official NGUAC 2020 Tryouts Review-

Hey there, glad to see you attempting at this contest again =)
Your audition piece is pretty ambitious, with an aggressive and complex rhythm: i really like the drop at 1:00, nicely done. It's the part that shows best how much you've improved. There are a pair of things i'd have done differently though: first, at 0:15 i'd have given a little lowpass/volume filter to the saw segments which come one 4-quarterbeat section yes, one no. They are not badly done, i just would have imagined that section better with those saws coming in a less abrupt way. Last, at 2:30 the second drop begins with a rhythmic section again, then at 2:47 it switched with a breakbeat part. I'd have switched those two parts to make the transition less anticlimatic and improve the flow a little bit; also, the mix
overall volume could have been a bit louder. Apart from those little complaints, mastering and sound selections are both flawless; this is without a doubt one beast of an entry. Keep it up like that and you'll get far in this competition! =)

Originality: 2/2
Composition: 2/2
Structure: 1.75/2
Tecnicity: 1.75/2
Impact: 2/2

Total: 9.5/10

ItzCorkscrew responds:

Thank u very much! <3 <3 I'm so glad u liked it, I'll keep working hard to make more interesting sounds! :D

-Official NGUAC 2020 Tryouts Review-

The track flows nicely, and the mix is overall enjoyable. However, there are a couple of moments where you could have polished better your mix: at 1:04, when the lowpass ends, the melody begins its loop again without any kind of fades or transitional elements; for me it was a small letdown before the build-up at 1:17. Also at 3:50, the second drop ends, a last section follows, then another drop begins at 4:04. I don't understand why you made this compositional choice, as it confuses the listener quite a bit: maybe a bridge with different harmonic content could have worked better. Despite those two complaints, the sound is spot on and you overall did a good job. Keep it up!

Originality: 1.5/2
Composition: 1/2
Structure: 1/2
Tecnicity: 2/2
Impact: 2/2

Total: 7.5/10

Astedroid responds:

" Also at 3:50, the second drop ends, a last section follows, then another drop begins at 4:04. I don't understand why you made this compositional choice, as it confuses the listener quite a bit: maybe a bridge with different harmonic content could have worked better."

That part was meant to be a quick break before the last "afterdrop" Also to give little freedom

Good piece! =)

EezySeven responds:

Thankeez!

The drums and percussions are a bit too weak for my liking.
Still, the mix is good, and you captured very nicely the futuristic synthwave atmosphere.
Well done!

ChronoNomad responds:

Fair enough. I prefer not to dive headlong into the Loudness Wars when it comes to percussion overtaking the melodies, and I'd rather there be some amount of nuance to the overall structure, as opposed to a solid brick wall. The beats still overtake the other instruments, decibel-wise, so I'm happy with it.

That said, I respect your preferences and am glad to hear that you enjoyed the atmosphere and found the mix to be good. We all have our own formulas for making music, and that sense of uniqueness is what makes it great. Thanks for leaving a quick review, mutty99!

Inspiring title and dedication to the GD community.
My suggestion to the listeners is to not think about Cosmic Growl when listening to this track: when I did, the song experience wasn't well affected.
Putting that feeling aside, this stands out pretty well :)

DJVI responds:

Thank you for the review :)

A bit repetitive, but still has a great sound!

DJVI responds:

Thanks for the review again!

Another really good classic, well balanced and entertaining.
This track always reminds me of a flash game called Jelly Escape, made by Armor Games and Tawstudio Entertainment.

DJVI responds:

Thank you again! I haven't heard of that game.

Wow, i forgot to review this one...
Absolute banger from start to end, and that's a fact!!

Fun fact: my favourite part is the piano segment at 1:36, which isn't present in the GD cut.

DJVI responds:

Yeah it was too long for GD. No ones hears it unless they listen the full song :D

Ok, with this one you legit impressed me :o

DJVI responds:

Awesome! Thanks you :D More is coming soon!

Programmer and Trance enjoyer.

Age 24, Male

Florence

Joined on 3/28/15

Level:
19
Exp Points:
3,731 / 4,010
Exp Rank:
14,024
Vote Power:
6.07 votes
Rank:
Town Watch
Global Rank:
56,037
Blams:
11
Saves:
131
B/P Bonus:
2%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
540